Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Movies

Staying Alive Review: Why Saturday Night Fever’s Sequel Was The Worst One Ever

‘Staying Alive’ fails to connect with the spirit of its predecessor, coupled with its reliance on clichéd characters and overblown musical numbers. It then became a sequel that not only failed to live up to expectations but also strayed far away from the legacy of ‘Saturday Night Fever.’

When ‘Staying Alive’ hit theaters on July 15, 1983, as the much-anticipated sequel to ‘Saturday Night Fever,’ expectations were sky-high. However, the film, directed by Sylvester Stallone, quickly proved to be a major letdown, earning a reputation as one of the most disappointing sequels in cinematic history.

The Film’s Premise

Set six years after its predecessor, ‘Staying Alive‘ follows John Travolta’s character, Tony Manero, now striving to make it on Broadway. Despite living in a rundown Manhattan hotel and working as a waiter and dance instructor, Manero’s ambition remains undimmed.

The film introduces new characters, including Tony’s patient girlfriend (Cynthia Rhodes) and a British dancer (Finola Hughes). The plot, centered around Tony’s involvement in a Broadway show titled ‘Satan’s Alley,’ differs from the gritty realism that defined ‘Saturday Night Fever.

Why is ‘Staying Alive’ a Flop?

One of the film’s most striking downfalls is the shift from the vibrant streets of Brooklyn to the manufactured glitz of Broadway. There is the absence of the original film’s depth, with the characters reduced to clichés and the dialogue lacking authenticity. In the end, the film fails to capture the essence that made ‘Saturday Night Fever’ a cultural landmark.

Despite its ambitious dance sequences and the inclusion of the Bee Gees’ iconic song ‘Stayin’ Alive,‘ the film faltered in delivering a coherent and engaging narrative. Its series of musical interludes failed to weave into a story, drawing unfavorable comparisons to other dance-focused films like ‘Flashdance.

Set against the backdrop of a Broadway production, the climax of ‘Staying Alive’ shows the film’s overreliance on spectacle over substance. The final scene, featuring extravagant elements like fire, ice, and laser beams, was overly theatrical and lacking in believability.

The film’s only redeeming moment is a victorious strut across Times Square to the tune of ‘Stayin’ Alive.’ This sadly reminds us of what could have been a worthy sequel to a beloved classic.

Financially, ‘Staying Alive’ was not a complete disaster. It grossed $127 million worldwide against a budget of $22 million. However, this box office success did little to salvage its critical standing. The film currently holds the honor of being the oldest film with a 0% score on Rotten Tomatoes.

Latest

Movies

The sequel to 'Constantine' is in the works, with Reeves coming back. But this time, he might take on a very different role, according...

Netflix

Brown says it feels strange to end but is excited for fans to see it.

Movies

She was shocked to find out this detail at the movie's release, just like the fans.

Entertainment

Despite the significant effort she put into her role for the film, Winslet admitted to forgetting she was part of the project.

Entertainment

A DC insider has shared news that a final project is reportedly bringing together two iconic voice actors for one last time.

You May Also Like

Entertainment

‘Superman: Legacy’ has a new name and logo now.

Entertainment

A DC insider has shared news that a final project is reportedly bringing together two iconic voice actors for one last time.

Entertainment

Marvel’s latest project, ‘Thunderbolts,’ is currently in production, and some interesting rumors are starting to pop up about the movie.